Use case

"Nothing material changed" — are you sure?

Updated August 31, 2026

Quick answer

Got an updated budget with hours until sign-off? Upload the last approved version and the new draft. We highlight every change — formula swaps, new headcount rows, chart updates — so you approve with evidence, not "nothing material changed."

Finance reviewer approving a budget diff with highlighted spreadsheet changes
Sign off with evidence — not "nothing material changed."

Thursday, close week

Budget v2 hits your inbox. The CFO wants it tomorrow. The file has 40 tabs. You can't re-read every number — but you can't sign off blind either. Upload the last approved version and the new draft. Review only what changed.

How teams use it before sign-off

  1. Analyst sends updated budget
  2. Controller uploads old vs. new
  3. Jump to changed drivers — revenue, headcount, capex
  4. Share a link with approvers. Done.

The edits that slip past a quick glance

  • A formula swapped for a hard-coded number
  • New rows hidden in a headcount tab
  • A chart that now tells a different story
  • A renamed sheet that breaks someone's link

These don't show up when you skim totals. A visual diff flags them.

Try it on a sample budget first

The free demo runs a realistic budget comparison — formula, revenue, and chart changes included. Takes under a minute.

Frequently asked questions

Why not just skim the totals? ▼
Because the risky edits hide in supporting tabs — a hard-coded override, a new capex row, a chart that tells a different story. Totals look fine. The model doesn't.
What should I check first? ▼
Formulas first — a number can look right but come from a broken reference. Then new rows, chart changes, and renamed sheets.
Run the budget demo Track every version during close →